Another Abstaining Clarification Amendment
20260425-0 \\ ??? words \\ Passed \\ Score: 0 \\ No summary
Preface: Due to the EACAā€™s ambiguity, I hereby propose this amendment in an attempt to clarify the exact functioning of abstaining.
Article I: All abstain and de facto abstain votes shall be not be counted towards the threshold required for a bill to pass.
Article II: If a piece of legislation either gets as many abstain votes as there are council members or does not get any ayes or nays in the 7 days after it is posted to the Voting Group Chat, the Vice President shall decide whether the legislation is passed or rejected.
Metadata
Internal ID: 381
Score: 0
Type: legislation/constitutional-amendment
API access: /381.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1777129834
Proposer: Then_Train8542
Original link: ANOTHER ABSTAINING CLARIFICATION AMENDMENT
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator: Floyd B. Olson Fan
Tags raw: ["NONE"]
Recorded by tracker: 2026-04-25 15:11:23
Tags(*WIP*)
This is currently experimental with no frontend for normal users to add tags. In the future users will be able to vote on and add "tags" to an entry.Current tags:
- No tags
History
- History hidden to logged out users to reduce spam. Login to view history.
