NOTICE: Any actions you take on a page with this warning will NOT persist.

✅ This page pulls data from the new backend and should be considered up-to-date.

Relevance Bill.

20260410-7 \\ ??? words \\ Passed \\ Score: 0 \\ No summary

This bill functions to add relavancy to objections
Relavant evidence will be defined as
Evidence that makes a fact more or less probable
Exclusions -
Prejudice. Moves to sway jury with emotion or likewise instead of with fact
Confusion
Waste of time
Character evidence
Rule of completeness - if opposing council believes evidence to be misleading they have to provide the context in its entirety.
Ex: evidence is admitted with one user saying - I'm gonna kill you. In context it is seen to be a joke. This snippet is misleading the jury
Really sorry to ask, but can council vote on this soon? I apologize greatly
Anyway love y'all <3

Metadata

Internal ID: 883
Score: 0
Type: legislation/unknown
API access: /883.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): undefined
Proposer:
Original link: N/A
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator:
Tags raw: ["NONE"]
Recorded by tracker: 1790456956

Tags(*WIP*)

This is currently experimental with no frontend for normal users to add tags. In the future users will be able to vote on and add "tags" to an entry.
Current tags: