The how the fuck is this a debate amendment (HTFITADA)
20260406-9 \\ ??? words \\ Rejected \\ Score: 0 \\ L.I.G.M.AArticle 1: Not even going to bother naming this.1.1: If an act/bill should’ve been considered an amendment and it passes through council it i
L.I.G.M.A
Article 1: Not even going to bother naming this.
1.1: If an act/bill should’ve been considered an amendment and it passes through council it is to work properly even under the incorrect classification.
1.2: If a user catches the fact it should’ve been an amendment they may post it and remove the bill/act immediately. This has a time limit of a month.
1.3: After a month the bill is to be considered an amendment.
1.4: This affects past bills.
1.5: If an act/bill was passed before the constitution was created it is considered always valid and does not need to be labeled an amendment.
1.6: Council may choose to remove a bill/act turned into an amendment by this bill with a 5/7 vote.
Metadata
Internal ID: 305
Score: 0
Type: legislation/constitutional-amendment
API access: /305.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1775514918
Proposer: Trickster-123
Original link: THE HOW THE FUCK IS THIS A DEBATE AMENDMENT
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator: API
Tags raw: ["NONE"]
Recorded by tracker: 2026-04-06 23:07:57
Tags(*WIP*)
This is currently experimental with no frontend for normal users to add tags. In the future users will be able to vote on and add "tags" to an entry.Current tags:
- No tags
History
- History hidden to logged out users to reduce spam. Login to view history.