[Home]  [Legislation]  [Archive]  - [0𝕋] ERR: user.username missing 
tg.zerr.cc is in legacy mode.
NOTICE: Any actions you take on a page with this warning will NOT persist.

Expert witnesses judicial amendment

20260406-1 \\ ??? words \\ Passed \\ Score: 0 \\ No summary

Overview - witnesses can be proved as expert witnesses which allows them to testify opinions in court under their expertise
Article 1:
An expert witnesses is defined in court as someone who
\-holds or has help a position that would reasonably grant them knowledge in said field
\-someone who has held that position for a reasonable amount of time (a month)
Article 2:
An expert may testify to their opinion as long as:
\-it is a reasonable conclusion to the evidence and data shown
\-it is in the scope of their expertise defined in court
Article 3:
Expert witnesses may not give their opinion on the ultimate issue (ex: an expert witness in a murder trial may not testify that the defendant did or did not commit the crime) though it may embrace it


Metadata
Internal ID: 297
Score: 0
Type: legislation/constitutional-amendment
API access: /297.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1775448810
Proposer: Equivalent_Elk2413
Original link: EXPERT WITNESSES JUDICIAL AMENDMENT
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator: API
Tags raw: ["NONE"]
Recorded by tracker: 2026-04-06 05:19:32
Tags(*WIP*) This is currently experimental with no frontend for normal users to add tags. In the future users will be able to vote on and add "tags" to an entry.
Current tags:
  • No tags
History
  • History hidden to logged out users to reduce spam. Login to view history.
Score: 0
Frequency

      
Comments View existing comments on this post.


(hide)
Rewrite WIP. Beta Test. Source.