[Home]  [Legislation]  [Archive]  - [0𝕋] ERR: user.username missing 
tg.zerr.cc is in legacy mode.
NOTICE: Any actions you take on a page with this warning will NOT persist.

The judicial sentencing limitations amendment.

20260403-5 \\ ??? words \\ Passed \\ Score: 0 \\ No summary

Preface: To curb the risks of the judiciary imposing overly harsh sentences, this amendment creates certain limitations
Article 1: The judiciary and admins can only issue permanent bans in cases where, extreme emotional or physical harm occurred, clear intentional damage to democracy occurs, ​or where one maliciously attempts these things.
Article 2: In the cases where one is coerced or was clearly not in a state of mind where they could properly make their own decisions permanent bans cannot apply.
Article 3: In the case new evidence about their state of mind or other circumstances that if previously discovered may have lead to a less harsh sentence, the guilty party with court approval can have a hearing by the judiciary to alter sentencing.


Metadata
Internal ID: 271
Score: 0
Type: legislation/constitutional-amendment
API access: /271.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1775237170
Proposer: Bob-The15th
Original link: THE JUDICIAL SENTENCING LIMITATIONS AMENDMENT
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator: Floyd B. Olson Fan
Tags raw: ["NONE"]
Recorded by tracker: 2026-04-03 17:50:48
Tags(*WIP*) This is currently experimental with no frontend for normal users to add tags. In the future users will be able to vote on and add "tags" to an entry.
Current tags:
  • No tags
History
  • History hidden to logged out users to reduce spam. Login to view history.
Score: 0
Frequency

      
Comments View existing comments on this post.


(hide)
Rewrite WIP. Beta Test. Source.