Laws protecting mental peace(?)

Proposition for Council: Passed r/TeenGovernment u/[deleted] posted 2026-03-13 13:42 UTC ↑7 · 100% 8 comments

I feel like civilians should be allowed to sue on the grounds of disruption of mental peace.

Of course, punishments for the offence would differ basing on the offence.

The punishment could be determined by the judge+jury starting from an apology+ a 30 minute timeout on the dc, to 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, a week, 2 weeks, a month, three months, 1 year, 3 years and then a perma ban.

7 comments

Zeedith- 2026-03-13 13:47 UTC ↑3

[Proposition for council recorded by ARPD as 20260313-0](https://tg.zerr.cc/bills/view?bid=20260313-0)

Bob-The15th 2026-03-13 14:28 UTC ↑2 ✎ edited 2026-03-13 14:47 UTC

I feel this is already protected under rules 1 and 8 as there is precedent of it being used for such things. I wish there was a bit of detail so this could be used in contexts that wouldn't already be covered.

Due_Camel6262 2026-03-13 14:39 UTC ↑2

Camel Endorsed

Dry_Editor_785 2026-03-13 14:44 UTC ↑2

how might one disrupt mental peace?

Dry_Editor_785 2026-03-13 14:46 UTC ↑2

It would be really funny to sentence someone to writing an essay, in order to be let back in.

Ill_Poem_1789 2026-03-13 15:27 UTC ↑1

"Apologize by writing an essay in no less than 300 words"

Trickster-123 2026-03-13 17:11 UTC ↑3

I feel like this would fall under rule 1.

But, hey, I like the idea, does need specification on what mental peace is tho

Literally-Apollo 2026-04-21 01:41 UTC ↑2

agreed ty broski

Post ID: t3_1rsno9s · Subreddit: r/TeenGovernment · Created: 2026-03-13 13:42 UTC · Cached: 2026-04-26 05:50 UTC · Versions: 1